Run for you lives!

News.com brings us a report that after years of toiling, researchers have finally created The Lamest Virus Evah™!

Kapersky Lab reports first iPod virus, sort of (tip o’ the antlers to Paolo and Matt Huber).

It only runs if you have Linux installed on your iPod.

And you have to execute it manually.

And it doesn’t really do anything.

RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!

The Macalope particularly liked Kapersky’s comment that

“Such viruses are created to demonstrate that it is possible to infect a specific platform…”

You know. The Linux on iPod platform. The LiPod.

Just like it sounds.

Real Steve: "Imagine."

Steve Jobs provides his Thoughts on Music (tip o’ the antlers to BoingBoing) and specifically DRM.

Here are some key sections:

Apple was able to negotiate landmark usage rights at the time, which include allowing users to play their DRM protected music on up to 5 computers and on an unlimited number of iPods.

However, a key provision of our agreements with the music companies is that if our DRM system is compromised and their music becomes playable on unauthorized devices, we have only a small number of weeks to fix the problem or they can withdraw their entire music catalog from our iTunes store.

So far we have met our commitments to the music companies to protect their music, and we have given users the most liberal usage rights available in the industry for legally downloaded music.

Apple has concluded that if it licenses FairPlay to others, it can no longer guarantee to protect the music it licenses from the big four music companies.

Imagine a world where every online store sells DRM-free music encoded in open licensable formats. In such a world, any player can play music purchased from any store, and any store can sell music which is playable on all players. This is clearly the best alternative for consumers, and Apple would embrace it in a heartbeat.

Why would the big four music companies agree to let Apple and others distribute their music without using DRM systems to protect it? The simplest answer is because DRMs haven’t worked, and may never work, to halt music piracy.

Much of the concern over DRM systems has arisen in European countries. Perhaps those unhappy with the current situation should redirect their energies towards persuading the music companies to sell their music DRM-free.

It’s an interesting read. Jobs also says that as only 3% of music on an iPod is FairPlay-protected, Apple doesn’t see it as a scheme to lock users in.

The part of Steve Jobs will be played by Charlton Heston. The part of Mitch Bainwol will be played by Yul Brynner (antler tip to Your Daily Dosage for the correction).

Are iTunes sales dropping?

The Macalope has a better question: who cares?

The Apple web is rife with cries of “woe is Apple” and angry denouncements today over Forrester Research’s report claiming that the only people still buying songs from the iTunes Store are a family of shut-ins in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

Forrester’s conclusion is that DRM isn’t working and people are still stealing music as their primary means of acquisition.

That’s not the Macalope’s experience, but for the sake of argument (and because it spares the Macalope from having to do a bunch of math), let’s say Forrester is right and iTunes sales are down 375 million percent or whatever they said.

Let’s look at some things that make this less concerning than you might think:

  1. Apple doesn’t make money on music sales. They’re used to drive iPod sales.
  2. iPod sales are still strong.
  3. iTunes is still by far the most popular online music store.
  4. Falling sales of DRM-ed music mean the recording industry has to consider non-DRM solutions.

The negatives are:

  1. The recording industry could come up with something more heinous than DRM.
  2. Apple will no longer have the “velvet lock” of iTunes DRM that keeps customers in iPods.

But then they’ll just have to keep people buying iPods by keeping them awesome.

So, can we all calm down, please? The Macalope can barely hear his iTunes-purchased Christmas music over all the shouting.

Yay, subscriptions!

Hey, kids! You looooooove subscription-based music subscription models, don’t you?!

Sure you do! Everyone does!

Why, Universal Music Group’s Jimmy Iovine loves subscriptions!

“We have to get into more of the revenue stream. The eventual answer may be a flat fee that enables you to listen to all the music you want.”

And he knows Bruce Springsteen!

But it’s not just him! The big brains at Jupiter Research likes subscriptions, too!

So why wouldn’t you love subscriptions?! Why ya gotta own everything? Are you greedy? Is that it? Just thinking about yourself and not struggling music industry executives, their brows moist with perspiration (albeit induced by the elliptical trainer) as they pick which music they’re going to ram down your throats this year?

Or maybe you’re thinking about the so-called “artists”, really nothing more than a collection of un-showered communists, if you ask the Macalope. Thank goodness someone is doing something to put them in their place.

No, no. The sooner you start sending your monthly tithe to the recording industry, the sooner we’ll achieve the perfect musical utopia they have planned for us.

UPDATE: Andy Ihnatko provides some strikingly similar thoughts in his Zune review.

iPod sales figures porn

You may recall the Macalope taking several careless goof balls to task for attempting to parlay the decline in iPod sales quarter over quarter since Apple sold an astounding 14 million units in the fourth quarter of 2005 as “slipping iPod sales.” Meanwhile, thoughtful analysts looked at the sales growth from the same quarters the prior year.

But the Macalope never dreamed that Apple would be able to beat 14 million and fully expected sales to be down this quarter from last year. Enter Piper Jaffrey’s Gene Munster who estimates Apple will sell 14.7 million iPods in the current quarter.

And he thinks that may be conservative.

“Our current expectations for the quarter could prove to be low,” Munster added.

Ooh, Gene.

Baby.

You know what the Macalope likes.

Simple answers to simple questions

To try to screw up Apple’s business model.

Cingular, smingular

First, some interesting iPhone speculation over on a couple of Jupiter Research blogs. First Ian Fogg lays out four potential scenarios for an iPhone, then Michael Gartenberg says it’s more likely a fifth, apparently unimaginable scenario.

That is, however, quite literally yesterday’s news as today’s is all about Cingular teaming up with Microsoft, Napster, Rhapsody, Yahoo, Sauron and, possibly, Darth Maul (the Macalope will refrain from pointing out how this rumor runs contrary to the argument that cell providers really like to run their own music stores. Oops).

In a Marketwatch interview today Gartenberg says that cell providers are looking for these alliances for compatibility and pricing reasons and that he doesn’t expect Cingular’s alliance (or the Zune or Sony) to significantly impact Apple’s position. He also believes the music cell phones will coexist with the iPod, rather than supplant it.

Bam

Monster quarter for Apple.  1.61 million Macs (biggest quarter ever) and 8.7 million iPods.

If you’ll remember, the Macalope made a conservative bet of 8.1 million iPods and he’s happy to be wrong.

And, for the silly pundits who like to compare quarter to quarter, 8.7 million in iPod sales is Apple’s second-best quarter ever.  Up year-over-year and from the previous two quarters.

Also, in a positive sign, the company apparently did provide at least some guidance for the current quarter.  Matt Deatherage had posted about concerns (antler tip to Daring Fireball) earlier that the options problem might make that impossible.

Dear Apple…

The Macalope loves his Macs. He loves their design. Their simplicity.

He loves their smell. Their touch. Their taste.  Their warmth in the middle of the night.

And he loves it that they don’t force him to reinstall the operating system every X number of days to get rid of viruses and malware (maybe there are other ways around this, but the Macalope knows many Windows users who resort to this).

The Macalope started thinking about security the other day when he read this article on ZDNet Australia (antler tip to MacSurfer).  He was all set to lay into it as part of his ongoing war against silly pundits, but the more he read, the more air was let out of his balloon of outrage (“Ballons of Outrage” come ten to a bag – ask for them by name at your local five and dime).

It’s true, there’s a lot to complain about in this piece. The lead-in referencing a system compromise that was only made possible by third-party software. The appearance of Artie MacStrawman (“OS X didn’t somehow, magically, prevent the attack as some users seem to think it’s capable of doing.”). The absurd idea that it’s “time to admit” anything, as if Apple should hang its head, kick at the dirt and say “I’m soooooorry”.

But, ultimately, there is a valid point there.

The single biggest contributing factor to the fact that Mac users don’t currently have to worry about security is that OS X has been less of a target than Windows because of its smaller installed user base.  Mac users can go on and on about the inherent advantages of Unix-based systems over Windows, how Apple is perfect and good and the embodiment of the pure radiant light of joy that fills the universe, but that’s still the biggest factor.

Now, the Macalope enjoyed your Get A Mac ad where the PC has a virus and it only made him a little itchy around the haunches at the thought that it might raise the pale, pimply faces of hackers looking for a new challenge.

David Maynor and John (Johnny Cache!) Ellch certainly noticed. If they had decided to use their powers for evil rather than good (well, “good” isn’t really the right word… how about “self-promotion”?), then one guy in a Starbucks somewhere might have lost his user data.

Granted, Maynor may have had to shove him out of the way and replace his kernel with a custom one to make it possible but, look, the point is that there are a few important lessons to take away from the SecureWorks debacle. The biggest is don’t stick a verbal cigarette in the eye of a highly partisan user base, but another is hackers are starting to notice the Mac.

You, Apple, apparently did not get that message as yesterday you decided to take a long drag off that verbal cigarette and make it nice and hot.

Hey, it was great that you got out ahead of this and announced the problem before it was all over the Internet.  And we all love a good jab at Windows – preferably something below the belt.

But shipping virus-infected iPods was your mistake.  Not Microsoft’s.  James “Randy” Abrams (the Macalope would rather not know how he got that nickname) is correct in saying:

The Apple iPod incident was not about Microsoft having a hardy operating system, it was all about security and process.

That Apple would blame Microsoft demonstrates a lack of understanding of remedial security and manufacturing processes. [The] virus was only a symptom of the problem. Apple didn’t know what they were shipping.

Of course the person who wrote the press release and the people who handle your vetting of third-party production controls are not the same.  But from an organizational standpoint, the point is dead on.  The comment was irresponsible.

So, speaking as a Mac user, Apple, the Macalope would really prefer it if you cut the crap.  How about being the strong, silent type on security, hmm?  No one needs any apologies (particularly Steve “iPod Users Steal Music” Ballmer).  But it’s one thing to have someone else slap a “hack me” sign on your back and it’s another to put it there yourself.

Love always,
The Macalope

Phil Schiller invented the wheel

Leander Kahney on the birth of the iPod:

The idea for the scroll wheel was suggested by Apple’s head of marketing, Phil Schiller, who in an early meeting said quite definitively, “The wheel is the right user interface for this product.”

The Macalope’s not sure he buys all the elements of the story. Toshiba built those little hard drives and didn’t know what to do with them? Does that make sense?